court no licence tax insurance

[gavin-drifter temple family]

hello everyone i was stopped in a car last year and i wasnt insured or had licence so they say they say i was banned but i had a licence that was issued to me from the tax office im tryin to fight it i was wondering if anyone had any ideas does the right to travel excist?

[komurchu]

paulhayes said:

the constition states we have the right to govern ourselves and make our own laws

lol....which constitution would that be?, and which article or where would that be written within this constitution?

[gavin-drifter temple family]

i was banned in 2004 for 7years in 07 i had an appeal i won that i went to the tax office to see what bans i had left and they told me i wasnt banned so they gave me a licence and i started driving then in 2010 i get summons to court for driving twice i got a ten year ban in feb on one of them and im fighting the 2nd one this month im just looking for some opinions im fightin it on the grounds of my right to travel

[JoeB]

I'd try saying it's a constitution right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Also it say's we have rights higher than any statute or act. Let us know how you get on and what you used.

[Brian of the family Whelan]

Gavin, I advise you start doing some research, there really is no substitute for it. You need to get into your mind who you really are - a sovereign. If you want to go to cout you should learn all the various tricks and attempts that are use to get you to contract. Try the - The Antiterriost - listen to his videos especially relating to being in court, also check out Marc stevens at http://marcstevens.net/ there is alot of info on Tir na Saor website in the archeves.
If you dont have the time or will to research then you might be better advised to go a more conventional route.

[komurchu]

Brian, all that you have posted above is completely outdated.
The antiterrorist and all those other guys had it all wrong in that they granted subject matter jurisdiction. Things have moved on significantly since these guys and I suggest that you also need to do your research, starting with Mr.T.
Another thing, possibly a typo on your part but you are not "a sovereign" but simply you are sovereign.

[Brian of the family Whelan]

Komurchu,
could you please not denigrate everything I post, I do my own research, the Antiterriost does deal with Subject Matter Jurisdiction. I am aware it is an important part of court procedure and that a judge should be stopped on every occasion he seeks to establich it. The fact of the matter is judges dont follow proper procedure and railway their way establishing SMJ. I have witnessed this myself on 2 occasions. I dont listen to Mr T because I dont understand what he is saying, his speaking voice is poor. I also spoke to a man some weeks ago who availed of Mr T services for court advice he remarked to me that he (Mr T) "was not worth a #po!&% and I gave him a €1000".

Regarding sovereignty, I am a sovereign - I am literally king of myself -
All authority relating to me is vested within me, any authority the state has is based on my consent. This last sentence is a summation of the freeman / sovereign movement.

[Eamonn O Brien]

The Road Traffic Act 1961, section 4 states

4.—(1) Save as is otherwise provided by this section, this Act applies to persons in the public service of the State and to vehicles owned by the State.

So if they can prove you were operating the vehicle in a public service capacity or that they own the car they have you.

If your car is registered with the state, which it prob is then you have technically asked the government to look after it for you while you reserve the right to use it.

With regards to proving you were operating in a public service capacity if you have a job and your paying taxes to the state again you're granting jurisdiction by complying to pay taxes. I'm sure you've heard of people saying there is no law saying you have to pay taxes. Have you ever seen proof you have to? At the end of the day you do a job for someone and they pay you accordingly. What right has any 3rd party to demand some of your money?

Id imagine the same applies if you're signing on each week. That signature proves it too.

These are things to get sorted before risking a summons. If you know for definite you don't claim any form of state benefit then they have no right even stopping you while driving. Just cos you have a license doesn't mean you are operating in the public service either. You can get a TV license doesn't mean ya have a TV...A license permits you to act in the public service legally. You have the benefit and privilege to use it when you want.Your birth cert is proof that you reserve those privileges.

The constitution protects a right to freedom of travel within the state. It also states that any bills or acts that are repugnant(disrespectful) to any provisions of the constitution are invalid.

But as I said if you dont like the ride dont buy the ticket, i.e. if you register your car you've asked the state to look after it. Under their roof its their rules...

Once they can prove you were operating in a public service capacity, then I'm afraid it mightnt be lookin too good for ya...

In saying that though, if they ban you again dont worry about it. Stop paying taxes and de register the car. The legal title is banned from driving, not you!

[paulhayes]

does anyone have the time to look up chemtrails over ireland, poisons.

4.—(1) Save as is otherwise provided by this section, this Act applies to persons in the public service of the State and to vehicles owned by the State.

So if they can prove you were operating the vehicle in a public service capacity or that they own the car they have you.

If your car is registered with the state, which it prob is then you have technically asked the government to look after it for you while you reserve the right to use it.

With regards to proving you were operating in a public service capacity if you have a job and your paying taxes to the state again you're granting jurisdiction by complying to pay taxes. I'm sure you've heard of people saying there is no law saying you have to pay taxes. Have you ever seen proof you have to? At the end of the day you do a job for someone and they pay you accordingly. What right has any 3rd party to demand some of your money?

Id imagine the same applies if you're signing on each week. That signature proves it too.

These are things to get sorted before risking a summons. If you know for definite you don't claim any form of state benefit then they have no right even stopping you while driving. Just cos you have a license doesn't mean you are operating in the public service either. You can get a TV license doesn't mean ya have a TV...A license permits you to act in the public service legally. You have the benefit and privilege to use it when you want.Your birth cert is proof that you reserve those privileges.

The constitution protects a right to freedom of travel within the state. It also states that any bills or acts that are repugnant(disrespectful) to any provisions of the constitution are invalid.

But as I said if you dont like the ride dont buy the ticket, i.e. if you register your car you've asked the state to look after it. Under their roof its their rules...

Once they can prove you were operating in a public service capacity, then I'm afraid it mightnt be lookin too good for ya...

In saying that though, if they ban you again dont worry about it. Stop paying taxes and de register the car. The legal title is banned from driving, not you!

[Dympna O'Brien]

fORGETR about using any quotes from thge constitution, Judges dont like smart alecs and they give you very little time. wERE you or were you not banned from driving ? Did yu tell the licencsing office that when you applied for your licence - because if you didnt you have completed fraud. Basicall they will tell you that you showed total disregard for the law by driving with no licence, insurance or tax and in a way they are right ? You put other peoples lives at risk. The best thing you can do is show remorse and take whatever they throw at your on the chin. It is unlikely you will be jailed unless you have "previous" - more likely you will either be disqualified OR fined heavily. Get a solicitor is my advice.

[Eamonn O Brien]

I retract my previous statement about the act only applying to public service, I mis read it.

The right to travel exists. It is protected by our constitution. The guards are sworn to uphold it. There are 2 sides to whats going on out there. On one side you have us born in this country and with rights protected by the peace officers / / / / / On the other side you have the legal title with benefits and privileges, and legislation enforced by policy enforcers (the garda siochana assuming a different role) So what happens is when they ask you questions when they stop you they are attempting to bring you over to their side or their "jurisdiction", now, who in their right mind would want to leave the jurisdiction with your rights protected and go to one where policies are enforced? No one. By letting the guard know this prior to continuing with any conversation with him then unless you have committed a crime he has no authority.

As for Dympna's point there, forget about using the constitution? Why on earth would you want to do that? You're giving up your rights by doing that. We need to start using them more for heaven's sake. The judge has sworn to protect the rights of the individual also...That's why they lose the plot when people ask for their oath in court because they know the defendant knows his rights...Stop being scared of these people! If they hold you in contempt of court or take you away it's just further unlawful detention. You have rights. It's not just a question of knowing them but knowing how to exercise them is key, and know when someone is trying to coax you away from the jurisdiction where they have full effect...

Don't commit any crimes and respect other people's rights and you should be just fine in life...

When i said earlier de-register your car, don't. I was wrong in saying that. The state is just the trustee of a trust you create when you register your car. Make sure they know that too. That's the only interest they have in it.

Jurisdiction is key...Know which one you stand in and always make it clear to them...