Add a Comment
Join Tír na Saor ~ Land of the Free
The Application of Commercial Law.
PURPOSE: To find out what group you are in: Provides a brief summary on the differences in bodies of law by definition More definitions regarding titles, property and possession Gives an overall view on how to get back control of your universe Explains how to make the UCC-1 contract and how to properly file it Explains how to establish own private treaty with the world FINAL PRODUCT: The ability to control one’s body and one’s property.** Commercial Law is non-judicial. This is pre-judicial (not prejudice). This is timeless. This is the base, the foundation beneath which any government or any of their court systems can possibly exist or function.That means what the courts are doing, and what all governments are ultimately adjudicating and making rules about, are these basic rules of Commercial Law. When you go into court and place your hand on the Bible you say, "I swear the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth . . ." you have just sworn a Commercial Affidavit...!!It's the conflict between Commercial Affidavits of Truth that gives the court something to talk about, that forms the entire basis of its action, and its being there , in their venue. Hence, one of the reasons attorneys always create controversy.No court and no judge can overturn or disregard or abrogate somebody's Affidavit of Truth. The only one who has any capacity or right or responsibility or knowledge to rebut your Affidavit of Truth is the one who is adversely affected by it. It's his job, his right, his responsibility to speak for himself. To issue his own affidavit because no one can speak it for him.No one else can know what your truth is or has the free-will responsibility to state it.This is YOUR job.**
How To Defeat Admiralty Courts And “The Law Of The See”Judge Dale, Ret’d – The Catholic word “See” conceals the influence of the Holy Roman Church over the corrupt corporate government and legal system.The term “see” comes from the Latin word “sedes”, meaning “seat”, which refers to the Episcopal throne (cathedra).The term “Apostolic See” can refer to any see founded by one of the Apostles, but, when used with the definite article, it is used in the Catholic Church to refer specifically to the see of the Bishop of Rome, whom that Church sees as successor of Saint Peter, the Prince of the Apostles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_SeeSedes Sacrorum (Latin Sedes for seat/see, Sacrorum for holy) otherwise known as Santa Sede and the “SS” also known in English as “Holy See” refers to the legal apparatus as a whole by which the Roman Catholic Pope and its Curia of Bishops claim historical recognition as a sovereign entity with superior legal rights. (http://one-evil.org/content/entities_organizations_holy_see.html)The Catholic Church uses two legal personalities with which to conduct its international affairs: the first is as an International state known as the Vatican City State, to which the Pope is the Head of Government. The second is as the supreme legal personality above all other legal personalities by which all property and “creatures” are subjects.The legal enforcability of its first personality as an International State is constrained by international law. The sovereign status of the Vatican City remains dependent upon the continued recognition of an agreement known as the “Lateran Treaty” signed between Catholic Facist Dictator and . . . Benito Mussolini in 1929 and his political supporter Pope Pius XI. This recognition remains in defiance and contempt to existing international laws prohibiting recognition of rogue states and laws created by mass murdering dictators.The legal enforcability of the second personality of the Catholic Church as the Holy See is dependent upon the continued adherence to legal statutes, definitions, conventions and covenants as have been accumulated since the Middle Ages concerning the primacy of the Pope over all property and creatures. These statutes, conventions and covenants remain the fabric and foundation of the modern legal system of most states in the world.To extend its legal strength using its second personality, the Catholic Church considers the region controlled by every bishop a See.Admiralty Law:FULL: http://www.shiftfrequency.com/admiralty-courts-law-of-the-see/
THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT:
Our 'Civil Courts' are all Admiralty/Maritime Administrative "Inferior Courts" - "Not of Record"..!!
They are Private courts of the Bar Associations, which are a w/wide franchise of the Private Bar Guilds of the 'City of London Corporation'..??
Make no mistake, they are Roman Civil Law Courts, and they still proceed as to the Roman 12 Tables.. known today as the 12 Legal Presumptions of Admiralty Law/Jurisdiction..!!
Twelve Presumptions of the Court.
: http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2014/12/10/twelve-presumptions-of-...Posted on December 10, 2014 | 13 Commentsjudge; WHEN YOU WALK INTO A COURTROOM JUDGE’S JURISDICTION, AT LEAST TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS ARE ALREADY IN FORCE – WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT!by AL Whitney (C) copyround 2014Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledgedCannon Law researcher Frank O’Collins (one-heaven.org) ferreted out these presumptions and helped make them available to the general population.
We cannot forget that our so-called ‘courts’ are run by a private guild by the name of the "British Accreditation Regency."
See: The BAR Card.From the book Fruit from a Poisonous Tree (page 58) by attorney Melvin Stamper, JD:“The scheme also provided for the control of the courts via the 1913 creation of the American Bar Association, whose parent organization was the European International Bar Association, which was the creation of Rothschild. This allowed the International Bankers to control the practice of law, in that the only ones permitted to practice before the courts were those who were educated under their brand of law, which was only Admiralty and Contract law. Common law of the people was to be replaced as it gave the natural man many jurisdictional protections from the bankers’ legislation.”
check out sarah lioness.
in a civil matter ,, no,wet ink sig, is needed, thats ony in criminal,,, we have to look at the statuets,, then play them at there own game,, now learn how.
Hi guys, this page is just for posting links and resources about 'Commerce and Government', it would be best if you started a thread in the forums for this discussion.
The only thing I know about a warrant is that its supposed to be signed by a judge, if not then its a forgery and you may be dealing with intruders if anyone tries to enter your home with it.
A big dog is great security but it really is like adopting another family member, and you need the time to give him/her.
tv licence, is a civil matter, no court will issue a warrent, onless criminal,,, its a bulk centre that sents the out when tv,/councils , want to make you believe there real courts,..
Dear Tir na Saor community,
does anybody have info about the present( Irish law) legal provision concerning quiet title action in disputes c
oncerning mortgages and bank charges on land registry , etc.; any such cases debated in court, outcomes, etc? Much obliged for any info or links. Much love, Maria
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity By: ***_____________________ *** (Agent)
Christopher: of the Lees family
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved
Please address all future correspondence in the matter to a direct Human Self, namely Christopher: of the Lees family, as commonly called.
Encl: Original paperwork as received.
Sorry I had to break it down, the message was too long for the system
Chris Lees - Penalty Charge Notice climb down by a Company called South Gloucestershire Council After Chris was given a Penalty Charge Notice by SGC he sent them this letter below. Below that you will see the letter sent to Chris by SGC saying the matter is now concluded with nothing to pay!
In care of:
(Address removed for publishing)
May 28th, 2009
Re: GS10092187, dated 26/05/09.
Notice of Discharge of Outstanding Fixed Penalty Charge and Request for Clarification.
South Glos Council
Please read the following notice thoroughly and carefully before responding. It is a notice. It informs you. It means what it says.
The reason why you need to read carefully is simple. I am offering conditional agreement. This removes controversy, and means that you no longer have any ultimate recourse to a court of law in this matter, because there is no controversy upon which it could adjudicate. You always have the option of dragging these conditions into a court of law only to be told that they are, indeed, perfectly lawful. That is, of course, always your prerogative should you decide to waste your time.
For this reason it is important that you consider and respond to the offer in substance. The 'nearest official form' will not suffice, and consequently is likely to be ignored by myself without any dishonour on my part.
On the other hand there is a time-limit on the agreement being offered. It is reasonable, and if it runs out then you and all associated parties are in default, removing any and all lawful excuse on your part for proceeding in this matter.
For these reasons it is recommended that you carefully consider this notice and respond in substance, which means actually addressing the points raised herein.
You have apparently made allegations of criminal conduct against me.
You have apparently made demands upon me.
I do not understand those apparent demands and therefore cannot lawfully fulfill them. I seek clarification of your document so that I may act according to the law and maintain my entire body of inalienable Natural Rights.
Failure to accept this offer to clarify and to do so completely and in good faith within 7 (seven) days will be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principal or other parties abandon all demands upon me.
I conditionally accept your offer to agree that I am legal fiction 'person' Mr Christopher Mark Lees and that I owe £70 for services rendered by your company, upon proof of claim of all of the following:
1. Upon proof of claim that I am a person, and not a human being.
2. Upon proof of claim that you know what a 'person' actually is, in legal terms.
3. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference between a 'human being' and a 'person', legally speaking.
4. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference between 'legal' and a 'lawful'.
5. Upon proof of claim that I am legal fiction 'person' Mr Christopher Mark Lees, being the entity to which your paperwork was addressed, and not Christopher: of the Lees family, as commonly called.
6. Upon proof of claim that the charge was the result of a lawful investigation unmarred by prejudice.
7. Upon proof of claim that I am a member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are enforcing.
8. Upon proof of claim that I showed you some sort of identification.
9 Upon proof of claim that there is a nameable society that I belong to and that the laws covered within any alleged transgressions state that they apply to me within that named society.
"http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-5-words-used-to-control-enslave-you. Hopefully you can open this, otherwise, copy and paste into address bar.
Keep in mind that the same whore mongers run the same scam in several countries.
Always demand sworn statements to facts they claim against you, once again it is not you, it is a person.
Everything they do is an offer to contract, they function under UCC and you should always respond in three days, otherwise it is considered accepted. This is something a fellow in England used against counsel, you may want to adopt it.
There are several problems, 1st is the license. A license is obtained for something that would otherwise be illegal. Look into the "lawful" law passed requiring such license, ACT, Statutes etc. , in general are not lawful , legal, yes. Legal pertains to laws the government creates to control their creations. The county, for example, shows your name in all capitalized letters----fiction. They are fiction and can only transact with fiction.
You probably have a drivers license, are you a driver, odds are not. In law words are the trick, ie. a driver is one who is compensated for the movement of good, cartage, and passengers, another trick. A passenger is one that pays to go from point A to B---it is all commercial.
I have not had a drivers license for 23 years, in the states and Isle of Man, it is all the same.
The best thing to do is to get a Law Dictionary and look at every word used, find the constitution for Ireland, it has been corrupted by joining the EU, regardless, find what is Lawful money, because you do not have any, it is all debt and you can not pay debt with debt.
If you do not want to challenge, what I would do is find some real money, silver coins, go down and present it for payment, in order to offset the debt, they only have debt. It does not have to be more than 10 coins. The odds are they will refuse the coins, have a document stating you presented lawful money for payment and it was refused, then have the person sign it, go higher if need be, and have a witness with you-----it may work.
Remember they can only transact with fiction, and you are a sentient being, taking a hit for the fiction person on the license---look up person, you are not one.
The older the dictionary the more clear and honest it will be.
This website is worth a look http://www.socialjustice.ie/
If you’ve never heard the word “Bilderberg” don’t feel you are uninformed. Some of the best-read people have no knowledge of this organization – formally known by its leadership and members as “The Bilderberg Meetings.” For more than 50 years, acting as a global ruling elite, Bilderberg’s very name and activities have remained largely hidden in the shadows, despite its immense clout in directing world affairs. Although in 1992, Larry Pope, the executive editor of the Citizen Times newspaper told one of its readers in a letter that “to my knowledge, such an organization does not exist and a media conspiracy to keep its existence a secret would be ludicrous,” the evidence shows otherwise. Now with the release of the Bilderberg Diary by veteran journalist James P. Tucker Jr., those who’ve never known of Bilderberg will get a first-hand account of its history (and its misdeeds) from the one journalist who has doggedly tailed the Bilderbergers all over the United States and Europe for the last quarter of a century. Although mass media in the United States – both print and broadcast – has determinedly suppressed news and information about – and the very existence of – Bilderberg, Tucker has established himself as the world’s foremost authority on Bilderberg, reporting on their intrigues in the pages of the D.C.-based American Free Press. In Bilderberg Diary Jim Tucker lays out – for the first time – his entire remarkable history of covering Bilderberg, his infiltration of Bilderberg meetings, the procurement of their private documents, and the shining of the spotlight of public scrutiny on Bilderberg’s shadowy affairs. Tucker’s colorful prose will introduce you to the little-known arena of the Bilderberg elite, a memorable and panoramic journey that lays bare the realities behind modern day international power politics in a way never seen before.
Welcome toTír na Saor ~ Land of the Free
Sign Upor Sign In
Or sign in with:
© 2017 Created by Kev.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.